An Essay on Criticism
Ferrick Gray
Working with Pope
Volume 1, Issue 3
Introduction (or What This is Not)
This analysis is not exactly a critique, but in some ways it may well be. One would be daring to criticize a master such as Pope. However, this is about analyzing the metrical variations that Pope has employed in his work. In some instances, the verses do not seem to follow without our stumbling across certain words. When the construction of the verse is explained, we can see how the verse is to be read. For the most part, Pope is very consistent, yet there are still variations that require the reader to be alert. Often, we immediately look for the iambic rhythm, but this is not always the case, and the verse will not read well if we enforce this rhythm.
This analysis consists of the metrical variations used in the entire work. For the verses to be analyzed, I have also included the companion verse in the couplet that is being analyzed.
Substitutions of the first foot of a trochee for an iamb are not considered in this analysis, as it is a common substitution to take place, and generally, the reader will have little difficulty in reading the verse correctly. The verses being looked at are those for which the metrical accent does not match the speech stress if we assume a normalized pentameter line.